Lawsuits in the News


Whoops! Plaintiff Hired Lawyer First, Then Bought Product

How Ridiculous?
 
 

A judge in New Jersey rejected a proposed class action against the makers of Arizona drinks, over claims that the drinks “All Natural” advertising is misleading.  Why?  The lead plaintiff couldn’t say for sure that she bought a drink BEFORE she hired a lawyer to sue the company, as is required by law (and common sense).


Read the story: Forbes

Average Ridiculousness Rating: 
 

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Connect

Facebook Twitter Stay Informed

Vote for this month's Most Ridiculous Lawsuit

May 2012

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

See Previous Polls

What was the Most Ridiculous Lawsuit Last Month? Click here to find out!What was the Most Ridiculous Lawsuit of 2010? Click here to find out!
Send Us Your Story

More Features

Lawsuit Climate 2010