I am a small business owner, and I have been a victim of several frivolous law suits from the same party. Even when I prevailed in one court, the plaintiff re-formulated the lawsuits and took them to adjoining localities in hopes of finding a sympathetic judge or jury. So far the plaintiff’s efforts have failed, but this so-called jurisdiction shopping continues.
Victimized by Jurisdiction Shopping
June 8, 2009
54 views
1 min read
You may also like
60 views
2 min read
45 views
1 min read
39 views
1 min read
3 comments
Categories
Latest videos
December 20, 2007
December 20, 2007
December 20, 2007
Vlog Posts Big
June 27, 2007
July 5, 2007
August 8, 2007
Vlog Posts List
July 5, 2007
August 8, 2007
Vlog Posts Slider
July 5, 2007
August 8, 2007
September 4, 2007
September 7, 2007
Vlog Categories
Vlog Playlists
Meks Social
Collaboratively harness market-driven processes whereas resource-leveling internal or "organic" sources. Competently formulate.
Plantiff should not be allowed to shop around and file same suit. Any judge that allows someone to do this should be investigated by the state. This is especially true if plantiff is a ‘repeat offender’. The business owner should file a counter-suit for harrassment and seek a large sum, under RICO if possible,
This doesn’t make sense. Once a final judgment has been rendered in one court, generally a losing-party can’t “venue-hunt” for a more sympathetic judge and jury over the same merits. It’s called Issue (or Claim, I forget) Preclusion.
coursework on a resume
design coursework
coursework questions